This truth recovery project is a vehicle of ongoing research, archival collection, publication, advocacy, and capacity-building. It is amassing a comprehensive registry of historic and continuing deaths and disappearances of a political nature resulting from the Cuban revolution over the course of two dictatorships (Batista’s and the Castros).
By gathering and telling the stories of the victims of the Cuban revolution, we hope that people and nations will understand the violent nature of the Cuban regime and support the people of Cuba in attaining their rightful freedoms.
This independent initiative upholds the intrinsic right of all people to live safely and in freedom, promotes a culture of respect for life and the rule of law, and remembers those who’ve paid the highest price.
The project is premised on the belief that acknowledgement of systemic injustices is vital for the psychological wellbeing of both survivors and society and that constructive remembering shapes a moral ethos that promotes reconciliation and helps avert future atrocities.
This work hopes to serve as a building block for an eventual transitional justice process.
Deaths and disappearances of a political and military nature attributed to the Cuban Revolution are documented irrespective of any political, ideological, and other attributes or affiliations of the victims. All findings are reported with objectivity and transparency.
The electronic database includes events beginning on March 10, 1952 (when Batista suspended democratic constitutional rule in Cuba, giving way to the revolutionary struggle) and incorporates actions taking place inside or outside the island as well as affecting Cubans and non-Cubans alike.
This work does not purport to present a comprehensive record of disappearances and fatalities. Many more cases are believed to remain unknown and/or unrecorded, including most deaths resulting from the Castro regime’s military interventions and sponsorship, support, and funding of international subversion.
“Documented cases” for the purposes of this project are merely those that have come to our attention and investigated.
Database case numbers are assigned randomly.
Records have been classified for “Death attribution,” “Cause of Death,” “Victim Type,” and other categories. This attempt to interpret complex information may be overly simplistic and not fully descriptive.
Sources and Conflicts of Evidence
Sources of case information are often listed in abbreviated form in the database but may be viewed in full detail in the Source Library. Name and contact information of primary sources are not available to the public to protect their privacy. Certain reported bibliographic sources are believed to actually replicate other cited sources.
Discrepancies found among different sources such as in spelling of names or other case details are noted as Conflict of evidence. When the sources disagree on specific information, the data is interpreted in the best possible way, however, the selection is not necessarily correct. Primary sources are usually given greater weight.
It is presumed that some bibliographic sources are derived from other sources also cited in this portal and merely duplicate the information, including any errors.